Skip to main content

Pope Benedict XVI

There are many things that can be said about the new Pope. I'll try to be balanced.

As conservative as they come, former Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger became head of the Roman Catholic Church a little before 18:00h CET on April 19, 2005. Before his election by the College of Cardinals he led the Church's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (formerly known as the Inquisition) where he disciplined some of the most brilliant theologists for falling outside the doctrinal boundaries of Catholic Dogma. With this he assured the Church's lingering in medieval attitudes 'per secula seculorum' as well as many faithful to exercise their God-given free will in favor of using their common sense when approaching issues like contraception.

Of course, one must also give the new pope the benefit or the doubt and there are signs that the new Pontiff is tempering his postures. Read this piece published electronically in Yahoo! News. Here are some quotations:

The new pope said he wanted to continue "an open and sincere dialogue" with other religions and would do everything in his power to improve the ecumenical cause.

The message was clearly designed to show that Benedict was intent on following many of the groundbreaking paths charted by John Paul, who had made reaching out to other religions and trying to heal the 1,000-year-old schism in Christianity a hallmark of his pontificate.

I think we can expect, at least for the short term, a continuation of John Paul II's Papal legacy. On the other hand he might be just what the Church needs: a person who, after consolidating doctrinal dogma in this solemn institution, is prepared - from that perspective - to open Catholicism to social modernity. After all, only Nixon could go to China.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

E.J. Dionne Jr. - Mike Castle's defeat -- and the end of moderate Republicanism

In this article we see not only a reflective tone, but a word of warning of the dangers of extremism.  If both parties are threatened by the Tea Party's media and financial savvy it is the GOP who stands to lose more from it.  As this lunatic fringe dominates the Republican Party's ideological agenda moderates and centrists within it are either moving out of the party or increasingly afraid to raise their voices to speak out against the polarizing forces that will put this republic on shaky ground politically and socially speaking. Politics not only deals with the exercise of power through decision-making and the formulation of policy.  It also deals with how we live with one another (cohabitation or in Spanish convivencia ) after the taking of those decisions and interacting socially with civility.  The Tea "Party" does not stand for that.  It does stand for the continuing atomization of American society.  It displays a pathological hatred of government ...

Remembering Senator Edward M. Kennedy

This extended article from Associated Press (see below) lists all the legislative achievements and political life of this man whose career expanded nearly five decades in the United States Senate and became the head of on Irish-American political clan that deeply influenced American politcs. It also mentions the tragedies endured by this family. Thank you Senator Kennedy. May you rest in peace. Mass. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy dies at age 77 http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_16026/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=aysplNAU Sent from my iPhone

A deep nail in the coffin of this Island-Nation: the assault on PR's Bar Association and other reflections on the banality of Puerto Rican politics

On the evening of October 13 (Black Tuesday) governor Luis Fortuño signed into law a nefarious piece of legislation, which eliminated compulsory membership fees for Puerto Rico's Bar Association. See coverage from El Nuevo Día , Caribbean Business , and El Vocero . It is a punitive measure directed at this institution for expressing solidarity towards laid-off government workers on September 25, 2009 (Black Friday). It is also a long-awaited measure by New Progressive Party lawyers, activists, legislators, and fanatics intolerant of dissent, and who have always considered the PRBA a constant irritant, a thorn on their side. As jubilant as some members of the governor's cabinet, legislators, supporters, and fanatics might feel, remember this: as functional or deficient a democratic society might be, it cannot be complete without civil society institutions and dissent. The weakening of the Puerto Rican Bar Association achieved just that. The PRBA might still exist, true, but it...