Skip to main content

Karol Wojtyla (1920-2005)

Pope John Paul II has died. What can I say about such an important and at times controversial figure in world history? I would have nothing to add to this NPR's obituary by Sylvia Poggioli. Read also this written obituary be The Guardian.

As a person who voluntarily separated from the Catholic Church because of all its banal medievalist views I always would take the opportunity of criticizing strongly the Pope for its stubborn adherence to strict traditional dogma. His resistance to change left the catholic faithful in some parts of the world flabbergasted, provoking in the end an exodus from the Church into other faiths or out of religion altogether. Still others remained in the Church humoring official Roman Catholic conservative preaching while realistically adapting their spiritual and practical needs to the realities of everyday life (such as their viewpoints on contraceptives, sex, and celibacy).

It is ironic that in this interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski by NPR's Debbie Elliot the former national security adviser in the Carter Administration emphasizes the Pope's respect for the autonomy of the individual... Funny he should mention that, especially when John Paul II's papacy was precisely - I believe - the very opposite. Despite some positive elements, it is his and the Church's meddling into one of the most beautiful gifts given to us by God, free will, which forms the most distinguishable part. Even more incomprehensible is his scornful reproach of Latin America's liberation theologists while emancipating Polish and Eastern European faithful from the grip of dictatorship and repression. Listen to this NPR report by Martin Kaste.

Still, may he rest in peace.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

E.J. Dionne Jr. - Mike Castle's defeat -- and the end of moderate Republicanism

In this article we see not only a reflective tone, but a word of warning of the dangers of extremism.  If both parties are threatened by the Tea Party's media and financial savvy it is the GOP who stands to lose more from it.  As this lunatic fringe dominates the Republican Party's ideological agenda moderates and centrists within it are either moving out of the party or increasingly afraid to raise their voices to speak out against the polarizing forces that will put this republic on shaky ground politically and socially speaking. Politics not only deals with the exercise of power through decision-making and the formulation of policy.  It also deals with how we live with one another (cohabitation or in Spanish convivencia ) after the taking of those decisions and interacting socially with civility.  The Tea "Party" does not stand for that.  It does stand for the continuing atomization of American society.  It displays a pathological hatred of government ...

Remembering Senator Edward M. Kennedy

This extended article from Associated Press (see below) lists all the legislative achievements and political life of this man whose career expanded nearly five decades in the United States Senate and became the head of on Irish-American political clan that deeply influenced American politcs. It also mentions the tragedies endured by this family. Thank you Senator Kennedy. May you rest in peace. Mass. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy dies at age 77 http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_16026/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=aysplNAU Sent from my iPhone

A deep nail in the coffin of this Island-Nation: the assault on PR's Bar Association and other reflections on the banality of Puerto Rican politics

On the evening of October 13 (Black Tuesday) governor Luis Fortuño signed into law a nefarious piece of legislation, which eliminated compulsory membership fees for Puerto Rico's Bar Association. See coverage from El Nuevo Día , Caribbean Business , and El Vocero . It is a punitive measure directed at this institution for expressing solidarity towards laid-off government workers on September 25, 2009 (Black Friday). It is also a long-awaited measure by New Progressive Party lawyers, activists, legislators, and fanatics intolerant of dissent, and who have always considered the PRBA a constant irritant, a thorn on their side. As jubilant as some members of the governor's cabinet, legislators, supporters, and fanatics might feel, remember this: as functional or deficient a democratic society might be, it cannot be complete without civil society institutions and dissent. The weakening of the Puerto Rican Bar Association achieved just that. The PRBA might still exist, true, but it...