Skip to main content

NYTimes: Iran Puts Opponents on Trial, but Critics Are Vocal

Something extraordinary is still happening in Iran. Trials of opposition leaders designed to intimidate critics of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad hardline regime are not having the intended effect. Voices are raised from every corner of the system telling that the trial and all the charade that feeds it is wrong and that further repression will end up imploding Iran. 

In a previous post I talked about how the present woes have at least part of their origin in past events. Some wouldn't like to be reminded but secularism (laïcité) was destroyed the day the United States and te United Kingdom decided to oust Dr. Mossadegh's left-wing government. Also, the oil junkies that we are and the political obsession with the region probably intensified at the time (1950s). 

Nevertheless, it still amazes me how, after three decades of religious rigidity people who lived through, and were born after the 1979 Islamic revolution are ready to have the regime loosening up that rigidity - through democratic politics - without necessarily discarding devotion and/or piety, and that these are better practice by choice, not by imposition. 

We'll see what ensues. In the meantime read the article below and tell me what you think.   

From The New York Times:

Iran Puts Opponents on Trial, but Critics Are Vocal
By ROBERT F. WORTH and NAZILA FATHI


A day after the Iranian authorities began a mass trial of people they accused of trying to start a revolution, opposition figures denounced the proceeding as a show....

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/03/world/middleeast/03iran.html

Get The New York Times on your iPhone for free by visiting http://nytimes.com/iphoneinstaller


Sent from my iPhone

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

E.J. Dionne Jr. - Mike Castle's defeat -- and the end of moderate Republicanism

In this article we see not only a reflective tone, but a word of warning of the dangers of extremism.  If both parties are threatened by the Tea Party's media and financial savvy it is the GOP who stands to lose more from it.  As this lunatic fringe dominates the Republican Party's ideological agenda moderates and centrists within it are either moving out of the party or increasingly afraid to raise their voices to speak out against the polarizing forces that will put this republic on shaky ground politically and socially speaking. Politics not only deals with the exercise of power through decision-making and the formulation of policy.  It also deals with how we live with one another (cohabitation or in Spanish convivencia ) after the taking of those decisions and interacting socially with civility.  The Tea "Party" does not stand for that.  It does stand for the continuing atomization of American society.  It displays a pathological hatred of government ...

Remembering Senator Edward M. Kennedy

This extended article from Associated Press (see below) lists all the legislative achievements and political life of this man whose career expanded nearly five decades in the United States Senate and became the head of on Irish-American political clan that deeply influenced American politcs. It also mentions the tragedies endured by this family. Thank you Senator Kennedy. May you rest in peace. Mass. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy dies at age 77 http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_16026/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=aysplNAU Sent from my iPhone

A deep nail in the coffin of this Island-Nation: the assault on PR's Bar Association and other reflections on the banality of Puerto Rican politics

On the evening of October 13 (Black Tuesday) governor Luis Fortuño signed into law a nefarious piece of legislation, which eliminated compulsory membership fees for Puerto Rico's Bar Association. See coverage from El Nuevo Día , Caribbean Business , and El Vocero . It is a punitive measure directed at this institution for expressing solidarity towards laid-off government workers on September 25, 2009 (Black Friday). It is also a long-awaited measure by New Progressive Party lawyers, activists, legislators, and fanatics intolerant of dissent, and who have always considered the PRBA a constant irritant, a thorn on their side. As jubilant as some members of the governor's cabinet, legislators, supporters, and fanatics might feel, remember this: as functional or deficient a democratic society might be, it cannot be complete without civil society institutions and dissent. The weakening of the Puerto Rican Bar Association achieved just that. The PRBA might still exist, true, but it...