Skip to main content

Article on UK Daily the Guardian: End of US Dominance...

I've been brooding about this news piece by UK daily The Guardian, which reports on a Policy Paper by the US National Intelligence Council (NIC) that forebears bad news in future geopolitics. The United States, it says, will not be able to call the shots in an increasing multi-polar and unstable world. It will also prove most difficult for this nation to forge 'coalitions of the willing' in an environment where emerging nations like Brazil, India, and China will rise to higher political and economic status in spite of the United States.

Disturbing indeed. However, there was a similar report similar report in the midst of G.W. Bush's election victory in 2004 where the world was, well, different. Quoting The Guardian 'it matched the mood of the times'

Forgive me for saying so, these reports have a way of waking the skeptic in me. What's changed in the course of four years? Are these reports a reflection of the intelligence community's attitudes towards the president? Will things fare worse just because Barack Obama is now the President of the United States?

Should we believe the report? After all didn't these intelligence agencies failed to warn us about the September 11 attacks? How about the shaky UK intelligence report affirming the presence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? Or the illusory reports that the Iraqi population will welcome US troops with flowers? How's that for wishful thinking?

More disturbing still would be if NIC would tailor these reports to match the wits of the president. In which case the NIC made in 2004 a —dangerous— fairy tale for a most inept George W. Bush.

Anyway, have a look on the report. Try and determine what's true and what's fiction

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

E.J. Dionne Jr. - Mike Castle's defeat -- and the end of moderate Republicanism

In this article we see not only a reflective tone, but a word of warning of the dangers of extremism.  If both parties are threatened by the Tea Party's media and financial savvy it is the GOP who stands to lose more from it.  As this lunatic fringe dominates the Republican Party's ideological agenda moderates and centrists within it are either moving out of the party or increasingly afraid to raise their voices to speak out against the polarizing forces that will put this republic on shaky ground politically and socially speaking. Politics not only deals with the exercise of power through decision-making and the formulation of policy.  It also deals with how we live with one another (cohabitation or in Spanish convivencia ) after the taking of those decisions and interacting socially with civility.  The Tea "Party" does not stand for that.  It does stand for the continuing atomization of American society.  It displays a pathological hatred of government ...

Remembering Senator Edward M. Kennedy

This extended article from Associated Press (see below) lists all the legislative achievements and political life of this man whose career expanded nearly five decades in the United States Senate and became the head of on Irish-American political clan that deeply influenced American politcs. It also mentions the tragedies endured by this family. Thank you Senator Kennedy. May you rest in peace. Mass. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy dies at age 77 http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_16026/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=aysplNAU Sent from my iPhone

A deep nail in the coffin of this Island-Nation: the assault on PR's Bar Association and other reflections on the banality of Puerto Rican politics

On the evening of October 13 (Black Tuesday) governor Luis Fortuño signed into law a nefarious piece of legislation, which eliminated compulsory membership fees for Puerto Rico's Bar Association. See coverage from El Nuevo Día , Caribbean Business , and El Vocero . It is a punitive measure directed at this institution for expressing solidarity towards laid-off government workers on September 25, 2009 (Black Friday). It is also a long-awaited measure by New Progressive Party lawyers, activists, legislators, and fanatics intolerant of dissent, and who have always considered the PRBA a constant irritant, a thorn on their side. As jubilant as some members of the governor's cabinet, legislators, supporters, and fanatics might feel, remember this: as functional or deficient a democratic society might be, it cannot be complete without civil society institutions and dissent. The weakening of the Puerto Rican Bar Association achieved just that. The PRBA might still exist, true, but it...