Skip to main content

A tradition of moderation broken by an intransigent and an extremist

[If you're seeing this in Facebook see the original entry at my blog and watch the videos]


Former Vice-President Dick Cheney is quite vocal on his criticism of foreign policy moves made by the Obama Administration.

Never mind the imprudent (Former VP AL Gore has done so in the past) and indiscreet character of his remarks; how does he manage to climb on this moral high horse, undermine Obama's presidency, and keep a straight face all at the same time?

I might be mistaken but, didn't he and the Bush administration had six years of correcting this gross tactical misjudgment that is the war on terrorism? Weren't they the ones who put American citizens in danger in the first place by diluting the effort fighting a war on terrorism in two simultaneous fronts with just a professional armed force? Don't forget, the effort in Afghanistan was a legitimate move, retribution for the Attacks in New York. Iraq had no justification and the evidence of links with islamic terrorism was shaky and questionable at best. With regards to Iraq perhaps it would have been better to continue containment as previous administrations had (see an earlier essay of mine covering such matters here).

Besides, how can a man criticize Obama's stance on national security when the actions of the Bush/Cheney administration post 9/11 endangered American Citizens further.  Not only that, former Vice-President Cheney had a moderate opinion on the matter of occupying Iraq.  This video from YouTube illustrates matters further.  Have a look.




So what changed?  Integrity?  See this similar video with a more critical and humorous approach.



So what happened to moderation?  The lack of it signified the doom of the GOP in the past elections.  And instead of introspection we see spitefulness, desperation, lack of creativity; all reeking of extreme ideology and a desire for political retribution of the worst kind (for an example of the latter see this Newt Gingrich interview as reviewed by the Huffington Post; also this).  What is disturbing indeed is some people are receptive for these ideas.  Check this DNC ad showed by the Huffington Post or see it below,


As The Guardian says Comment is free...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

E.J. Dionne Jr. - Mike Castle's defeat -- and the end of moderate Republicanism

In this article we see not only a reflective tone, but a word of warning of the dangers of extremism.  If both parties are threatened by the Tea Party's media and financial savvy it is the GOP who stands to lose more from it.  As this lunatic fringe dominates the Republican Party's ideological agenda moderates and centrists within it are either moving out of the party or increasingly afraid to raise their voices to speak out against the polarizing forces that will put this republic on shaky ground politically and socially speaking. Politics not only deals with the exercise of power through decision-making and the formulation of policy.  It also deals with how we live with one another (cohabitation or in Spanish convivencia ) after the taking of those decisions and interacting socially with civility.  The Tea "Party" does not stand for that.  It does stand for the continuing atomization of American society.  It displays a pathological hatred of government ...

Remembering Senator Edward M. Kennedy

This extended article from Associated Press (see below) lists all the legislative achievements and political life of this man whose career expanded nearly five decades in the United States Senate and became the head of on Irish-American political clan that deeply influenced American politcs. It also mentions the tragedies endured by this family. Thank you Senator Kennedy. May you rest in peace. Mass. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy dies at age 77 http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_16026/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=aysplNAU Sent from my iPhone

A deep nail in the coffin of this Island-Nation: the assault on PR's Bar Association and other reflections on the banality of Puerto Rican politics

On the evening of October 13 (Black Tuesday) governor Luis Fortuño signed into law a nefarious piece of legislation, which eliminated compulsory membership fees for Puerto Rico's Bar Association. See coverage from El Nuevo Día , Caribbean Business , and El Vocero . It is a punitive measure directed at this institution for expressing solidarity towards laid-off government workers on September 25, 2009 (Black Friday). It is also a long-awaited measure by New Progressive Party lawyers, activists, legislators, and fanatics intolerant of dissent, and who have always considered the PRBA a constant irritant, a thorn on their side. As jubilant as some members of the governor's cabinet, legislators, supporters, and fanatics might feel, remember this: as functional or deficient a democratic society might be, it cannot be complete without civil society institutions and dissent. The weakening of the Puerto Rican Bar Association achieved just that. The PRBA might still exist, true, but it...